Base stabilization additives are used to increase the strength and stiffness of road foundations on weak and susceptible soils. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) quantifies the structural contribution of pavement layers by introducing granular equivalency (GE) factors. While numerous additives exist for improving the performance of aggregate base layers, this study focuses on proprietary additives including Base One, Claycrete, EMC SQUARED, PennzSuppress and Roadbond EN1. The laboratory study revealed that EMC SQUARED was the superior stabilizer, with an optimum dosage set 15% higher than the manufacturer recommended dosage (MRD). The long-term performance of proprietary additives was monitored by considering full-scale field implementation with optimum additive dosages obtained from laboratory investigation. Controlled sections without stabilization exhibited higher values in the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) and composite elastic modulus right after construction, while the impact of stabilizers on the increasing strength of the full depth reclaimed (FDR) base was revealed after two years of construction. Falling-Weight Deflectometer (FWD) tests demonstrated a progressive increase in the stiffness of stabilized sections over time, surpassing the control section's stiffness after two years. The economic analysis utilizing Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) indicated that stabilized sections, particularly those treated with EMC SQUARED, offered lower Equivalent Uniform Annual Cost (EUAC) values across various maintenance scenarios. These findings suggested potential cost savings over a pavement's life cycle with higher GE factors of recycled asphalt pavement base aggregate treated with proprietary additives. The findings will contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the benefits, feasibility, and design considerations associated with using commercial stabilizers in FDR base layers.
Concrete grinding residue (CGR) is a slurry waste consisting of water and concrete fines generated from diamond grinding operations that is used to smooth a concrete pavement surface. During this process; CGRs are mostly disposed along the roadside; which can influence soils and plant communities along the roadways. To understand the effects of CGR on soil physical and chemical properties and plant growth; a controlled field site at the Kelly Farm in Iowa was used with CGR application rates of 0; 10; 20; and 40 dry ton/acre to test properties of soils and plants before the application and one month; six months and one year after the CGR application. Two roadsides along Interstate 90 in Minnesota where CGR material was applied in the past were investigated as well. Laboratory and field experiments were conducted to measure plant biomass; bulk density; hydraulic conductivity; infiltration; pH; electrical conductivity (EC); alkalinity; metals; cation exchange capacity (CEC); exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP); and percentage base saturation (PBS) of soil samples collected from the test sites. Statistical analyses were conducted to correlate the CGR additions to the properties of soils and plants. The results of statistical analyses from the Kelly Farm indicated that CGR material did not significantly affect soil physical properties and plant biomass but impacted the chemical properties of soil. Changes in some soil properties such as pH and percent base saturation (PBS) due to CGR did not persist after one year. The results from two Minnesota roadsides indicated that the areas receiving CGR applications in the past did not negatively affect soil quality and plant growth.