Pedestrian Crossings: Uncontrolled Locations (Guidebook)

Image
Date Created
2014
Report Number
2014-21G
Description
This guidebook was developed to help Minnesota transportation agencies evaluate their uncontrolled pedestrian crossings and determine appropriate treatment options. The guidebook recommends when to install marked crosswalks and other enhancements at uncontrolled locations based on a number of factors, including the average daily vehicle count, number of pedestrians, number of lanes, and average vehicle speed. It helps agencies rate a crossing for pedestrian service, and it includes a flow chart and several worksheets to assist in data collection and decision making. When using the guidebook, practitioners are guided through an 11-step evaluation process. Based on the results of the evaluation, users can identify what level of treatment is appropriate for their location, ranging from in-street crossing signs to overhead flashing beacons to traffic calming devices such as curb bump-outs. For each potential treatment option, the guidebook includes information on advantages, disadvantages, recommended locations, and cost. The development of the guidebook was funded by the Minnesota Local Road Research Board.

Data Collection Worksheets: Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Evaluation Incorporating Highway Capacity Manual Unsignalized Pedestrian Crossing Analysis Methodology

Date Created
2014
Report Number
2014-21S
Description
The data collection worksheets in this spreadsheet pertain to report 2014-21, Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Evaluation Incorporating Highway Capacity Manual Unsignalized Pedestrian Crossing Analysis Methodology.

Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Evaluation Incorporating Highway Capacity Manual Unsignalized Pedestrian Crossing Analysis Methodology

Image
Date Created
2014
Report Number
2014-21
Description
This report provides a procedure for the evaluation of uncontrolled pedestrian crossing locations that takes into account accepted practice, safety and delay. The analysis procedure builds on previous research and adds in delay considerations to develop a methodology appropriate for use by jurisdictional agencies in the evaluation of treatments at uncontrolled pedestrian crossings.